Not a Think Tank — A Cartel

Spread the love

Why the Council on Foreign Relations Is the Deep State's Crown Jewel

The grand theater of American "democracy" rolls on: we the people line up, cast votes, cheer our chosen puppets, and pretend the script is ours. But yank the curtain back — even just a crack — and the illusion shatters. The real directors aren't elected; they're entrenched, unaccountable, and they don't answer to ballots. Presidents? Figureheads reading lines fed to them. The true power brokers operate from the shadows: the international deep-state network, with the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) as one of its crown jewels.

This isn't tinfoil-hat ranting; it's a cold look at history through an anarcho-capitalist lens — where the state and its corporate cronies form a parasitic class ruling over the productive people who are simply trying to live their individual lives.

The Roots: Secret Societies and Power Lust Are Nothing New

Power-hungry networks engineering control? Older than the republic itself. George Washington himself sniffed the stench early. In 1798, he read John Robison's Proofs of a Conspiracy and took it seriously — not as fringe paranoia, but as a real threat. The book warned that Bavarian Illuminati radicals (tied to Freemasonic circles) had crossed the Atlantic, spreading Jacobin chaos to subvert the young republic. Washington didn't laugh it off; he worried.

The playbook hasn't evolved much. Today's usual suspects — Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg, World Economic Forum — whisper in the wings. But the granddaddy of American elite coordination? The CFR.

Birth in the Ashes of War: From "the Inquiry" to Globalist Cartel

The CFR didn't sprout in a vacuum. It emerged from the blood and mud of World War I. In 1917, as America entered the slaughter, a shadowy group called "the Inquiry" formed — around 100 bankers, lawyers, and intellectuals under Edward Mandell House, Woodrow Wilson's unelected puppet-master. House? A Fabian socialist with Marxist leanings who fantasized about remaking society top-down.

His novel Philip Dru: Administrator (1912) reads like a blueprint for what followed: a dictator seizes power, imposes a central bank, graduated income tax, and neuters political parties. Sound familiar? The Federal Reserve Act (1913), the 16th Amendment (income tax, 1913), and the two-party cartel that still pretends to compete — all bloomed shortly after.

The Inquiry helped draft Wilson's Fourteen Points — seemingly noble calls for open trade and a "general association of nations." Noble on paper; in reality, the seed of supranational control. At the 1919 Paris Peace Conference, the Treaty of Versailles punished Germany into the ground (hello, future WWII), and the League of Nations push failed in the U.S. Senate — too blatant a sovereignty grab.

House didn't quit. In a fancy Paris hotel, he rallied allies: create Institutes of International Affairs. Britain got Chatham House; America got the Council on Foreign Relations, officially incorporated July 29, 1921, in New York.

Funding? The usual vampire squid: John D. Rockefeller, Paul Warburg (Fed architect), Jacob Schiff, Otto Kahn, J.P. Morgan interests. These weren't benevolent donors; they were the same crew that exploited the 1907 Panic to force through the Fed. First president: John W. Davis, Morgan's personal lawyer. Vice president: Paul Cravath, another Morgan man. Chairman: Russell Leffingwell, Morgan partner. Not a think tank—a cartel in suits.

The Long Game: Wars as Investments, Sovereignty as Collateral

From WWII through the Cold War, CFR fingerprints appear everywhere. Their quarterly Foreign Affairs isn't casual reading — it's the script. Ideas published there routinely become U.S. policy. Every administration since FDR? Stuffed with CFR alumni. Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Nixon, Clinton (over 100 in his crew), even Trump got "seasoned" with them. As Gary Allen put it in None Dare Call It Conspiracy: no real difference between the parties' insiders; they're all playing for the same club.

Admiral Chester Ward, former Navy Judge Advocate General and CFR member, dropped the mask in 1975:

The main purpose of the Council on Foreign Relations is to promote the disarmament of the U.S. and its surrender of sovereignty to a one-world government.

He saw two factions — one eroding borders, the other (Wall Street elite) craving global banking monopoly under their thumb. Method? Flood academia, media, and government with "scholarly" rationalizations for surrender.

The intelligence swamp? Nearly every CIA director since Allen Dulles (CFR pillar) carried the card. The Agency often acts less as America's defender, more as the club's enforcer.

Membership today? Invitation-only, over 5,000 strong (as of recent tallies around 5,291 individuals plus corporate tiers). The Board reads like a rogue's gallery: BlackRock's Larry Fink (trillions under management), Laurene Powell Jobs, Alphabet's Ruth Porat. Rank-and-file: Wall Street wolves, media barons, ex-Secretaries of State, Pentagon brass, Fortune 500 execs (Apple, Chevron, Goldman, Google, Meta). Perks include private briefings from Treasury secretaries and CIA directors.

Secrecy? Baked in. Article II of bylaws: leak meeting details, you're out. Chatham House rules on steroids. The press? Complicit silence — more coverage in old Pravda than the NYT.

The Bottom Line: Curtain-Pullers vs. the People

Is the CFR a harmless debating society for statesmen? Or the men behind the curtain, scripting endless wars, debt, and erosion of sovereignty for profit and control? History leans hard toward the latter. Wars aren't accidents — they're investments that fatten multinationals, bind nations in treaties, and inch toward a new world order.

In libertarian class terms: this is the political/corporate ruling class versus the productive people. The state isn't neutral; it's the tool elites use to extract wealth and power from the rest of us.

So next time you hear a politician parrot "global leadership" or "international order," ask: whose order? Who's writing the lines?

Drop a comment: Who's pulling your strings these days?

Leave a Reply