Seriously. They absolutely hate you.
They're breaking you down. Preparing you to accept a meager existence. It's inevitable after all. Resistance is futile.
CEO of Palantir Says AI Means You’ll Have to Work With Your Hands Like a Peasant
Speaking at the World Economic Forum yesterday, Karp insisted that the future of work is vocational — not just for those already in manufacturing and the skilled trades, but for the majority of humanity.
In the age of AI, Karp told attendees at a forum, a strong formal education in any of the humanities will soon spell certain doom.
“You went to an elite school, and you studied philosophy; hopefully you have some other skill,” he warned, adding that AI “will destroy humanities jobs.”
Alex Karp, the CEO of Peter Thiel's All-Seeing Eye, is such a creepy globalist villian, it's almost as if someone had cast him.
I don’t believe the hype. Never do. Not buying the hype has never burned me. It is a safe, you might say, conservative view of the world. AI hype is exactly that - hype.
I've been using ai (check out Stateless Video). You can prompt it to do something, but if you don’t understand what you're looking for, you'll be taken endlessly down the wrong path. Humans won't be replaced. AI is not taking over.
AI doesn’t think. It recognizes patterns. Amazing as it is, even AI won't be able to solve impossible math.
AI hype is crashing into reality. Stay calm.
In short, it's increasingly looking like both the AI doomers and boomers were both wrong. AI's trajectory is starting to look less like a time machine or space elevator and more akin computers, smartphones, televisions: The technology will get better, it will almost certainly change our lives in the fullness of time, but it will more likely do so incrementally — to the point that if AGI (artificial general intelligence) or superintelligence do in fact one day arrive, it might not seem like much of a leap at all.
There's perhaps no better example of this happening than OpenAI's latest and long-anticipated model, GPT-5, which was touted with a bang and landed with a shrug. Ahead of launch, OpenAI's Sam Altman said he'd felt "useless" compared to the model's intelligence, even drawing parallels with the Manhattan Project. When it arrived, users apparently felt less intimidated. "The degree of overhyping was too significant," one person wrote. "In the absence of massive gains, all you have is hype," wrote another.
Same goes for all of the military threats and hype.
Just assume everything is a psyop until proven otherwise. That way you're always ahead of the crowd.
What do you think?
